Five Constituency Statements were received, and one from the At-Large Advisory Committee, regarding this PDP. Commercial and Business User Constituency Intellectual Property Constituency The Internet Service Provider and Connectivity Provider Constituency Non-Commercial User Constituency Registrars Constituency At-Large Advisory Committee Note: The gTLD Registry Constituency did not submit a constituency statement. All of the statements submitted agreed that the development of a defined, transparent, predictable process for the consideration of changes to gTLD registry services is within ICANN's purview, and will be beneficial for the community. Areas of agreement about the process specified by two or more constituencies:
For all of the above areas of agreement, there are still some considerable differences between the constituencies on the specifics of the issues involved. While all may agree that the process should be timely, most have different views on what that means. Also, there were some issues raised by a single constituency and not addressed at all by others, such as how much it will cost to implement a new process (CBUC), what recourse will exist for ICANN and the community if an evaluation fails to accurately assess harm (ISPCP), and whether the process should be different for dominant/non-dominant TLDs (NCUC). |
- Home
- Summary of Constituency Statements on Future new Services or Actions by gTLD Registries