Re: [whois-sc] DRAFT 4 of Task force 2

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

please ignore this mail ;( 

Sorry,

tom

Am 20.10.2003 schrieb Thomas Keller:
> Milton,
> 
> to make it short I agree with your argumentation. Minimizing
> does not necessarily mean that now existing data has to be
> taken out nor does it mean that there can't be additional data.
> It just identifies the work that has to be done. Maybe we should
> clarify this a bid by saying:
> 
> "is the minimum required information today"
> 
> This indicates that we should have a look at the data elements
> from a present perspective which includes uses for law enforcement etc.
> and does not only consider past uses, which were merely of technical
> nature.
> 
> Best,
> 
> tom
> 
> 
> Am 17.10.2003 schrieb Milton Mueller:
> > 
> > >>> Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 10/17/03 12:27PM >>>
> > >Minimizing data elements under the constraint that contactability be
> > >maintained is a clear task that can be addressed in a rational
> > >policy discussion; the balance that you allude to in the second part
> > >of your message is captured quite well by that language.
> > 
> > Yes, I agree.
> > 
> > Let me reiterate that this is just a terms of reference,
> > not a policy. 
> > 
> > The issue of what constitutes acceptable levels
> > of contactibility is to be determined by the Task Force. I 
> > don't see how that determination is prejudiced by words
> > asking what data elements are absolutely required
> > for contactibility. I do believe that it is prejudiced by shifting
> > the standard to "optimizing contactibility." If we wanted to
> > optimize contactibility we needn't worry about privacy
> > at all. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> Gruss,
> 
> tom
> 
> (__)        
> (OO)_____  
> (oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
>   | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
>   w w w  w  
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w