Re: [whois-sc] Accuracy as an issue area
to be frank, the RC is supports Bruces suggestion on how to move
Am 10.10.2003 schrieb Bruce Tonkin:
> Hello Marilyn,
> > I understand Steve Metalitz' suggestion and consider it a
> > better approach to focus on Issue 5. It is consistent with
> > the prioritization undertaken by the group.
> It is my current understanding that issue 5 is the first task of Task
> force 2.
> Task force 2 may have a one year duration, as it works through a work
> program of other tasks that were identified din the original WHOIS
> Privacy report.
> It would seem that we should have a separate teleconference to discuss
> the other priority issue of accuracy. I would prefer that we create a
> separate terms of reference for accuracy (task force 3). The GNSO
> Council may decide to combine task force 3 with 2, but let's at least
> work on the priority issues of:
> - Data mining (relating to misuse for marketing)
> - Registrant knowledge of data collection and distribution practices
> (relating to privacy)
> - Accuracy
> as distinct issue areas.
> With regard to accuracy there are two distinct issues
> - verification of data at time of collection
> - maintenance of data over time
> The recent WHOIS task force resulted in an improvement in maintenance
> (the WHOIS data reminder policy), but no outcome as yet on improved
> verification at time of data collection.
> I will schedule a separate teleconference to focus on the accuracy
> Perhaps Steve in addition to his suggestions for task force 2, could
> review my first attempt at a task force 3 and consider what a separate
> task force on accuracy might look like.
(oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of
| |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger!
w w w w