Re: [tf2-sg2] How to proceed?

["Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Okay, let's try to talk at 10 AM tomorrow.  Glen:  can you set that up?

Jordyn

On Mar 18, 2004, at 9:55 AM, Steve Metalitz wrote:

> I would be available for a short call at 10 am EST tomorrow (Friday).
>
> I did not receive any earlier message from Thomas either.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:44 AM
> To: Jordyn A.Buchanan
> Cc: GNSO SECRETARIAT; tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [tf2-sg2] How to proceed?
>
>
> I could probably join a call at 10am Eastern tomorrow.
>
> On 2004-03-18 09:25:24 -0500, Jordyn A.Buchanan wrote:
> > From: "Jordyn A.Buchanan" <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: GNSO SECRETARIAT <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > 	tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:25:24 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [tf2-sg2] How to proceed?
> > X-Spam-Level:
> >
> > Hi Thomas:
> >
> > For some reason, I didn't receive your earlier message.  I'm in the
> > midst of a bit of an e-mail migration, though, so it may have arrived
> > in the midst of that.
> >
> > I agree that we should have a call and need to put together some of 
> > the
> > data that we've seen thus far.  Does anyone have availability 
> > tomorrow?
> >  Unfortunately, I have a pretty narrow window of opportunity, from
> > about 8 AM until 11 AM Eastern Time.
> >
> > Jordyn
> >
> > On Mar 18, 2004, at 4:58 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, that's what I was looking for.
> > >
> > > I note, though, that there was no feed-back to my earlier suggestion
> > > to set up a conference call for this sub-group.  If members are
> > > currently unable to make the necessary time commitments, I'd suggest
> > > that we get back to the entire task force with these news and try to
> > > draft some more support.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > --
> > > Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2004-03-17 09:36:20 +0100, GNSO Secretariat wrote:
> > > > From: GNSO SECRETARIAT <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:36:20 +0100
> > > > Subject: RE: [tf2-sg2] How to proceed?
> > > > Reply-To: gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > X-Spam-Level:
> > > >
> > > > Could it be this:
> > > > http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow2tf/msg00076.html
> > > > see also
> > > > http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois-privacy/raa-whois-16dec03.shtml
> > > >
> > > > GNSO Secretariat
> > > >
> > > > mardi 16 mars 2004 11:28 Thomas Roessler a ecrit
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > we should probably spend some time on figuring out what we report
> > > > back to the task force and the ICANN community at large on current
> > > > practice with respect to WHOIS.  I'd suggest we schedule a
> > > > conference call for some day later this week.
> > > >
> > > > We will have to look at the material that we received pre Rome, and
> > > > the staff's report on registrars' current practice in implementing
> > > > policies related to notification of and consent by registrants.
> > > > (Glen, Barbara: Where's that report, again? I have the feeling that
> > > > I've received a copy some time ago, but have lost it.) Also, there's
> > > > a response from .pl directly to Task Force 3, and the CENTR survey
> > > > at <http://www.centr.org/meetings/ga-21/WHOIS-paper-v1.0.pdf>; see
> > > > also
> > > > <http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow3tf/msg00112.html>.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/