RE: [tf2-sg2] How to proceed?

[Steve Metalitz <metalitz@xxxxxxxx>]

I would be available for a short call at 10 am EST tomorrow (Friday). 

I did not receive any earlier message from Thomas either. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:44 AM
To: Jordyn A.Buchanan
Cc: GNSO SECRETARIAT; tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tf2-sg2] How to proceed?


I could probably join a call at 10am Eastern tomorrow.

On 2004-03-18 09:25:24 -0500, Jordyn A.Buchanan wrote:
> From: "Jordyn A.Buchanan" <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: GNSO SECRETARIAT <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> 	tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:25:24 -0500
> Subject: Re: [tf2-sg2] How to proceed?
> X-Spam-Level: 
> 
> Hi Thomas:
> 
> For some reason, I didn't receive your earlier message.  I'm in the 
> midst of a bit of an e-mail migration, though, so it may have arrived 
> in the midst of that.
> 
> I agree that we should have a call and need to put together some of the 
> data that we've seen thus far.  Does anyone have availability tomorrow? 
>  Unfortunately, I have a pretty narrow window of opportunity, from 
> about 8 AM until 11 AM Eastern Time.
> 
> Jordyn
> 
> On Mar 18, 2004, at 4:58 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> 
> >Thanks, that's what I was looking for.
> >
> >I note, though, that there was no feed-back to my earlier suggestion
> >to set up a conference call for this sub-group.  If members are
> >currently unable to make the necessary time commitments, I'd suggest
> >that we get back to the entire task force with these news and try to
> >draft some more support.
> >
> >Regards,
> >-- 
> >Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On 2004-03-17 09:36:20 +0100, GNSO Secretariat wrote:
> >>From: GNSO SECRETARIAT <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>To: tf2-sg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:36:20 +0100
> >>Subject: RE: [tf2-sg2] How to proceed?
> >>Reply-To: gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>X-Spam-Level:
> >>
> >>Could it be this:
> >>http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow2tf/msg00076.html
> >>see also
> >>http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois-privacy/raa-whois-16dec03.shtml
> >>
> >>GNSO Secretariat
> >>
> >> mardi 16 mars 2004 11:28 Thomas Roessler a ecrit
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>we should probably spend some time on figuring out what we report
> >>back to the task force and the ICANN community at large on current
> >>practice with respect to WHOIS.  I'd suggest we schedule a
> >>conference call for some day later this week.
> >>
> >>We will have to look at the material that we received pre Rome, and
> >>the staff's report on registrars' current practice in implementing
> >>policies related to notification of and consent by registrants.
> >>(Glen, Barbara: Where's that report, again? I have the feeling that
> >>I've received a copy some time ago, but have lost it.) Also, there's
> >>a response from .pl directly to Task Force 3, and the CENTR survey
> >>at <http://www.centr.org/meetings/ga-21/WHOIS-paper-v1.0.pdf>; see
> >>also
> >><http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow3tf/msg00112.html>.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 

-- 
Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/