<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] WG: [council] Fast Flux DNS
- To: "'Thomas Keller'" <tom@xxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] WG: [council] Fast Flux DNS
- From: "John Berryhill" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:48:59 -0500
- In-reply-to: <004e01c879e5$49ad1250$fa0d11ac@1und1.domain>
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Organization: John Berryhill, Ph.d., Esq.
- References: <004e01c879e5$49ad1250$fa0d11ac@1und1.domain>
- Reply-to: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ach5Y+rup0mKNAmFRLSXPSiF8APvlgAgH3lQAA7hh3A=
> the BC wants to turn all of us into
> their private law enforcement squad.
That's fine. Empowering registrars to disable domain resolution for
businesses and ISPs which do not employ adequate safeguards against botnets
seems like a fine idea.
Simply develop a "profile" which detects servers running Microsoft software
on a Verizon IP address, using a yahoo.com admin contact, and you can pretty
much tell there's a disaster waiting to happen.
Or did I misread the SSAC report?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|