<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: Fwd: Re: [registrars] Re: FW: ICANN per-name fee at start of AGP vs at exit.
- To: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [registrars] Re: FW: ICANN per-name fee at start of AGP vs at exit.
- From: Paul Goldstone <paulg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:18:04 -0500
- Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <200802091726.m19HQWBA011753@pechora1.lax.icann.org>
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <25059428.1202457094411.JavaMail.root@m08> <200802091726.m19HQWBA011753@pechora1.lax.icann.org>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bob,
Perhaps I'm not looking at it right, but I understand kiting to be
when domains never actually leave the AGP. If a company registers,
deletes and registers domains within the AGP, a percentage threshold
of the current or previous months positive registrations would work
because 5% of nothing is nothing.
Best Regards,
~Paul
:DomainIt
At 11:44 AM 2/9/2008, Robert F. Connelly wrote:
>At 02:40 AM 2/8/2008 Friday -0500, Paul Goldstone wrote:
>> Both of which seem like good ideas to me.
>
>Dear Paul: I'd certainly be happy to pay ten or twenty cents (US$0.20) to help stop the abuse. A percentage will not deter kiting.
>
>Regards, BobC
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>After all is said and done ---
>A lot more gets said than done;-}
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|