ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Fwd: Re: [registrars] Re: FW: ICANN per-name fee at start of AGP vs at exit.

  • To: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [registrars] Re: FW: ICANN per-name fee at start of AGP vs at exit.
  • From: Paul Goldstone <paulg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:18:04 -0500
  • Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <200802091726.m19HQWBA011753@pechora1.lax.icann.org>
  • List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <25059428.1202457094411.JavaMail.root@m08> <200802091726.m19HQWBA011753@pechora1.lax.icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Bob,

Perhaps I'm not looking at it right, but I understand kiting to be 
when domains never actually leave the AGP.  If a company registers, 
deletes and registers domains within the AGP, a percentage threshold 
of the current or previous months positive registrations would work 
because 5% of nothing is nothing.

Best Regards,

~Paul
:DomainIt


At 11:44 AM 2/9/2008, Robert F. Connelly wrote:

>At 02:40 AM 2/8/2008 Friday  -0500, Paul Goldstone wrote:
>>  Both of which seem like good ideas to me. 
>
>Dear Paul:  I'd certainly be happy to pay ten or twenty cents (US$0.20) to help stop the abuse.  A percentage will not deter kiting.
>
>Regards, BobC
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>After all is said and done ---
>A lot more gets said than done;-} 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>