<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Submission from the Registrar Constituency regarding views on transfers policy questions
Sorry about that Paul. I must have missed your email. The actual call
for submissions was many, many weeks ago, although I was delayed until
recently in putting the final summary together. My request last week
was for those that had submitted comments to verify the fairness and
accuracy of the summaries. I did include one late submission, and I
could have included yours had I seen your email. The late submissions
were included as an appendix to the main summary.
Again, sorry.
-ross
On 4-Feb-08, at 3:46 PM, Paul Goldstone wrote:
Ross,
I sent the following on Saturday:
"I also think it should be clarified that a registrar is ultimately
responsible for providing an auth code even when a reseller is
involved. I didn't see that mentioned in the document you sent, but
it's something we deal with on a regular basis so I assume we're not
the only ones."
I agreed with many of your other points in the document and just had
that extra point to add (which I thought was useful). Is it possible
that my email was missed, or were my comments not formatted correctly,
or did I misunderstand who was able to submit comments?
Best Regards,
~Paul
:DomainIt
At 02:28 PM 2/4/2008, Ross Rader wrote:
As promised, attached is the final document summarizing a collection
of views from the membership of the registrar constituency. If you
have any questions, please let me know.
Also, thank you for the extension. It was very helpful.
Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783
http://www.domaindirect.com
"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
- Erik Nupponen
Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783
http://www.domaindirect.com
"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
- Erik Nupponen
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|