ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Submission from the Registrar Constituency regarding views on transfers policy questions

  • To: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] Submission from the Registrar Constituency regarding views on transfers policy questions
  • From: Paul Goldstone <paulg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:46:07 -0500
  • Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <4C642AC1-E0BD-4BA2-B440-FC0D327A9963@tucows.com>
  • List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <4C642AC1-E0BD-4BA2-B440-FC0D327A9963@tucows.com>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ross,

I sent the following on Saturday:

"I also think it should be clarified that a registrar is ultimately 
responsible for providing an auth code even when a reseller is 
involved.  I didn't see that mentioned in the document you sent, but 
it's something we deal with on a regular basis so I assume we're not 
the only ones."

I agreed with many of your other points in the document and just had 
that extra point to add (which I thought was useful).  Is it possible 
that my email was missed, or were my comments not formatted correctly, 
or did I misunderstand who was able to submit comments?

Best Regards,

~Paul
:DomainIt

At 02:28 PM 2/4/2008, Ross Rader wrote:
>As promised, attached is the final document summarizing a collection  
>of views from the membership of the registrar constituency. If you  
>have any questions, please let me know.
>
>Also, thank you for the extension. It was very helpful.
>
>Ross Rader
>Director, Retail Services
>t. 416.538.5492
>c. 416.828.8783
>http://www.domaindirect.com
>
>"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
>- Erik Nupponen
>
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>