RE: [registrars] Update on Tasting Ballot

[Paul Goldstone <paulg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bob,

My point is that the proposed ballot does not address the actual amendment.

BTW, Jon's proposed amendment ballot was sent on Jan/25/2008 at 11am 
EST.  72 hours from then is Jan/28/2008 at 11am EST, but I just 
received the ballot ahead of time and despite open discussion on the matter.

~Paul
ps. It's insightful.  Either way, it's better than being called an epistle ;)


At 05:51 PM 1/27/2008, Robert F. Connelly wrote:

>At 05:32 PM 1/27/2008 Sunday  -0500, Paul Goldstone wrote:
>>Also, I'm sorry to point out more confusion, but the main ballot 
>>refers to the views of registrars, whereas the amendment is asking for 
>>the position of RC members. 
>
>Dear Paul: That is a very inciteful comment.  In my mind, I had equated the "position" of the Constituency to be commensurate* with the majority "view" of the majority.  
>
>Cordially, 
>BobC
>
>* Footnote:  Another word to look up in the Oxford Dictionary, unless you're a Yank and rush to Webster's   --- along with the correct spelling of  "inciteful", or is it "incitefull", my spell program doesn't like either of them;-{