<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] ICANN funding travel for GNSO council reps
- To: "'Ross Rader'" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Adrian Kinderis'" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] ICANN funding travel for GNSO council reps
- From: "John Berryhill" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:55:09 -0500
- Cc: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <F8377FAD-ABD8-42BB-AC12-02A9CC327325@tucows.com>
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Organization: John Berryhill, Ph.d., Esq.
- References: <1A0AABD464D03F43BC34963252162FB204F36786@companyweb> <F8377FAD-ABD8-42BB-AC12-02A9CC327325@tucows.com>
- Reply-to: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acg3ZJGnr9nm44RgRJCYshINGrGxBwAAKKXw
> Each and every constituency is represented
> by professional advocates who are paid to do this work.
The difference between the well considered positions of Ross and Adrian is
the difference between principle and practice.
It can be argued that the lack of travel funding is a contributing cause of
the circumstances you point out, Ross. Either one's rich uncle died, or an
interested party is picking up the tab.
But from, e.g. the Bizconst website:
"The BC represents business of all types - multi-nationals, medium-size
companies and small enterprises. One of the Constituency's strengths is its
association membership - which extends BC outreach directly to over 50,000*
companies and indirectly to over 1.5 million companies worldwide."
50,000 companies can replace their UNICEF box in the lunchroom for an
afternoon. If that's a conflict they can move BC collection day from
Halloween to April 1st, although it's hard to tell which would be more
appropriate for the BC.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|