ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] ICANN funding travel for GNSO council reps

  • To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] ICANN funding travel for GNSO council reps
  • From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:14:21 -0500
  • Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <1A0AABD464D03F43BC34963252162FB204F36786@companyweb>
  • List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <1A0AABD464D03F43BC34963252162FB204F36786@companyweb>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Under no circumstances should any travel be funded for the GNSO constituency Councillors. Each and every constituency is represented by professional advocates who are paid to do this work. There is no reason why this expense should be off-loaded to ICANN.

-r

On 5-Dec-07, at 11:42 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:

All,



There is currently some discussion on the GNSO council list with respect to ICANN potentially funding GNSO Council Representatives to travel to
ICANN meetings.



I was hoping to get some feedback from the Registrar Constituency to
pass onto the Council on this matter.



Here are some initial thoughts and questions to get you started;



-          Should all Constituencies be funded?

-          Should all Representatives be funded?

-          Is this appropriate use of ICANN's budget and could ICANN's
money be spent better ways?

- Is the GNSO Council so important to the ICANN process and is it important to have as many Constituencies and Representatives present
at the meetings (the main forum for decision making) as possible?

-          The ICANN Board's travel is funded

-          The Nominating Committee's travel is funded

-          Is funding travel to ICANN meetings a higher priority than
other funding needs?



I welcome discussion and feedback on the above.



For what it is worth I do believe that ICANN should be funding travel
for all Councillors on the GNSO. The GNSO is an important link in the
chain and having Councillors unable to attend the meetings inhibits
efficient decision making. There are many other areas we could look to
economise in ICANN's budget and I believe that this is one that would
benefit the ICANN community as a whole.



That said, the RC Rep's to the Council will, of course, convey the view
of the group.



Thanks.







Adrian Kinderis
Managing Director

AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web: www.ausregistrygroup.com <http://www.ausregistryinternational.com/ >




The information contained in this communication is intended for the
named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain
legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action
in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error,
please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.






Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783
http://www.domaindirect.com

"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
- Erik Nupponen







<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>