RE: [registrars] Dues Structure

["Jeffrey Eckhaus" <jeckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bob,

 

 

I do not support the motion that only the Treasurer be in possession of
the amounts of dues paid and knowledge of reductions. I support that the
full ex-com be aware of all fees paid. 

This is not to say that I do not trust whoever is Treasurer to be
confidential, but I believe in a system of checks and balances and the
full ex-com will supply that

 

 

 

Jeff

 

 

 

________________________________

From: Robert F. Connelly [mailto:BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 11:24 PM
To: Jeffrey Eckhaus
Subject: RE: [registrars] Dues Structure

 

At 10:12 PM 7/31/2007 Tuesday  -0400, Jeffrey Eckhaus wrote:



Bob,
 
<snip>





 I believe in forgiveness with confidentiality but not paying more


Dear Jeff:  My amendment is to be applied to the Main Motion, $750 with
forgiveness to $250.  It reads as follows:

Proposed Amendment to Budget Motion:

Moved that only the Treasurer be in possession of the amount of dues
paid by each member of the Registrar Constituency. The amounts dues paid
must not be divulged to any other officer or to any other member or to
any agency or authority outside the Registrar Constituency, GNSO, or
ICANN.  Total privacy is to be assured.

end quote:

There are those who would misuse the information, I think it is a
private matter and should be kept confidential.

I would appreciate your endorsement.

Regards, BobC




 
Jeff