ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Dues Structure


Bob,

 

I have gotten a little lost with all the individual proposals so I am
not sure which was your amendment. If it was for the idea that some
registrars pay more than the standard fixed fee, with no additional
benefits, I do not support that. It is an idea that may be great in
principle but not practice. I believe in forgiveness with
confidentiality but not paying more

 

Jeff

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert F. Connelly [mailto:BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:57 PM
To: Jeffrey Eckhaus
Cc: Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Dues Structure

 

At 06:32 PM 7/31/2007 Tuesday  -0400, Jeffrey Eckhaus wrote:

>and the need for confidentiality in fee reductions and the full ex-com
to abide by that confidentiality. 

 

Dear Jeff:  May I take that as an endorsement to my amendment to the
Main Motion?  Regards, BobC 

 

 

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>