RE: [RC Voting] RE: [registrars] Dues of $750 with "forgiveness" for those who choose to pay $250.

["Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bob,

 

Frankly, most of them are there because I have asked you several times
to remove them from the list, and you are incapable or unwilling to do
so.

 

Some of these people have not worked for Momentous for many years.

 

I have asked you many many times to remove these people.  Do you think
you can now ?

 

lorraine@xxxxxxxxxxxx
jen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
taryn@xxxxxxxxxxxx
wayne@xxxxxxxxxxxx
"Mike Arrington" mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

And we do use our main parent company's email addresses for mailing
lists etc.  But that does not make Momentous.ca a Registrar. What is
your point ????

 

Rob.



 

 

From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 2:26 AM
To: Registrars Constituency; RC Voting Members
Subject: Re: [RC Voting] RE: [registrars] Dues of $750 with
"forgiveness" for those who choose to pay $250.

 

At 03:33 AM 7/30/2007 Monday  +0000, Rob Hall wrote:



I am also not sure what your example is trying to say.  I note that you
have highlighted the fact that the General Counsel of Momentous.ca
responded that NameScout et al supported the letter. Momentous.ca is not
a Registrar, and you have somehow taken issue with Jennifer's standard
signature lines as General Counsel.  Momentous.ca has never signed nor
supported a Constituency Statement.  


Dear Rob: I guess I was misinformed.  Can you explain why the following
email addresses appear in the RC mailing list:

lorraine@xxxxxxxxxxxx
dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx
jen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
lilian@xxxxxxxxxxxx
taryn@xxxxxxxxxxxx
wayne@xxxxxxxxxxxx
"Mike Arrington" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


Are they or were they employees of an ICANN Accredited Registrar?

Regards, 
BobC