<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] .COOP agreement
- To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [registrars] .COOP agreement
- From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:41:17 +0200 (CEST)
- Cc: CORE Secretariat <secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Nevett,Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Registrar Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, werner.staub@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <46497E40.5040804@tucows.com> from Ross Rader at "May 15, 2007 05:32:48 am"
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Ross,
it is OK to take a closer look at where people are coming from, though
I had hoped that the community support we provided over the past years
has given us some credibility. In any case, "closer look" should also
include the argument itself. I do not feel comfortable that the
statement is rejected just because it comes from someone who knows
both sides of the business.
Yours,
Marcus
> CORE Secretariat wrote:
>
> > I conclude that this phrase actually does deserve to be in all sponsored
> > TLD agreements.
>
> As a registry operator, I'm not surprised to see CORE take this position.
>
> For the rest of us who do business as registrars and work with
> registrants, the existence of these exemptions is a concern.
>
> ICANN has no right to delegate away the policy responsibilities of the
> community via its contracts with registry operators and - yet it
> continues to do so.
>
> -ross
>
--
Global Village GmbH Tel +49 2855 9651 0 GF Marcus Faure
Mehrumer Str. 16 Fax +49 2855 9651 110 Amtsgericht Duisburg HRB9987
D46562 Voerde eMail info@xxxxxxxxxxx Ust-Id DE180295363
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|