ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] .COOP agreement

  • To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] .COOP agreement
  • From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:41:17 +0200 (CEST)
  • Cc: CORE Secretariat <secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Nevett,Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Registrar Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, werner.staub@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <46497E40.5040804@tucows.com> from Ross Rader at "May 15, 2007 05:32:48 am"
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Ross,

it is OK to take a closer look at where people are coming from, though
I had hoped that the community support we provided over the past years
has given us some credibility. In any case, "closer look" should also
include the argument itself. I do not feel comfortable that the
statement is rejected just because it comes from someone who knows
both sides of the business.

Yours,
Marcus


> CORE Secretariat wrote:
> 
> > I conclude that this phrase actually does deserve to be in all sponsored 
> > TLD agreements.
> 
> As a registry operator, I'm not surprised to see CORE take this position.
> 
> For the rest of us who do business as registrars and work with 
> registrants, the existence of these exemptions is a concern.
> 
> ICANN has no right to delegate away the policy responsibilities of the 
> community via its contracts with registry operators and - yet it 
> continues to do so.
> 
> -ross
> 


-- 
Global Village GmbH  Tel +49 2855 9651 0     GF Marcus Faure
Mehrumer Str. 16     Fax +49 2855 9651 110   Amtsgericht Duisburg HRB9987
D46562 Voerde        eMail info@xxxxxxxxxxx  Ust-Id DE180295363



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>