Re: [registrars] RE: PDP Dec 05: Reserved Names Working Group: response needed

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't believe that we need policy in this area at this time. The 
number of reservations and the size of the "problem" are both small 
enough that continuing to pursue this in an ad hoc manner between ICANN 
staff and the registry in question seems appropriate. Until it can be 
demonstrated that there are security or stability issues, I believe 
ICANN's policy community should continue to focus its efforts in areas 
where there is clear harm as a higher priority.
Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
> Registrars:
>
>  
>
> Please see the following note from Liz Williams with the ICANN staff.
> Please provide any comments on this issue to Liz, Ray, and the list.  It
> doesn't make sense to try to get a formal constituency position in less
> than a week.
>
>  
>
> Thanks.
>
>  
>
> Jon
>
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liz Williams [mailto:liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 2:56 AM
> To: Nevett, Jonathon; Tony Holmes; David W. Maher; Philip Sheppard;
> Kristina Rosette; Milton Mueller
> Cc: Ray Fassett
> Subject: PDP Dec 05: Reserved Names Working Group: response needed
>
>  
>
> Hello everyone
>
>  
>
> Ray Fassett is chairing a subgroup of the Reserved Names Working  
>
> Group and he's asked me to assist with getting some additional  
>
> information from Constituencies.  Could you please respond to Ray  
>
> directly?
>
>  
>
> "A sub group of the GNSO Reserved Names Working group is examining  
>
> the current practice that requires Registry Operators to reserve from  
>
> registration gTLD strings at the second level (and third level where  
>
> applicable).  The purpose of this work is to advance the progress of  
>
> PDP 05, new TLD's.  At this time, we would like to request your  
>
> feedback to a possible recommendation that would allow for  
>
> registration gTLD strings at the second level.  For example, the  
>
> current practice is that the .jobs Registry Operator requires  
>
> permission from ICANN to unreserve travel.jobs.
>
>  
>
> If this reservation and ICANN approval requirement did not exist for  
>
> new TLD's, what adverse effects, if any, would this have upon the  
>
> members of your constituency?
>
>  
>
> Due the short time line the sub-group is working within to be of  
>
> beneficial service to the work of PDP 05, we respectfully request  
>
> feedback from your constituency no later than end of business day,  
>
> Tuesday May 1, 2007."
>
>  
>
> Many thanks.
>
>  
>
> Liz
>
>  
>
> ......................................................
>
>  
>
> Liz Williams
>
> Senior Policy Counselor
>
> ICANN - Brussels
>
> +32 2 234 7874 tel
>
> +32 2 234 7848 fax
>
> +32 497 07 4243 mob
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>