<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] FW: RRAs
- To: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: RRAs
- From: "Mitchell, Champ" <Cmitchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:40:32 -0500
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Accv0KkXX4896b4XQfu9YPnnFQuyBQAPavqAAAEkXkAAM+TqoAABbXLA
- Thread-topic: [registrars] FW: RRAs
I would argue that to be "it" requires two things. It must be both
proposed as an amendment by VeriSign and approved by ICANN. What was
proposed by VeriSign was not approved by ICANN. What was approved by
ICANN was not proposed by VeriSign. So there is no amendment that will
go into effect automatically. As the situation currently exist, I
believe it is correct to say that, unless you signed what VeriSign sent,
the RRA as it existed prior to VeriSign's proposed amendment is and will
remain the only effective RRA.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Berryhill
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:01 AM
To: 'Registrars Constituency'
Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: RRAs
>So we are all assumed to have signed it after 30 days, and be
>bound by any new, approved agreement.
To be clear - "it" here being the ICANN approved agreement.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|