ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] FW: RRAs


Hi Jon,

Doesn't the current Agreement state that if a Registrar doesn't return a
signed agreement within 30 days then the revised agreement automatically
goes into effect?

So, for Registrars who have not returned any signed Agreement, it should
really be a matter of not really knowing which "revised agreement" is
automatically going into effect, rather than Verisign cutting anyone
off. Doesn't that make Verisigns "commitment" not to cut anyone off a
moot point? Or am I missing something here?

Thx

Richard Lau




On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 09:43:59 -0500, "Nevett, Jonathon"
<jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Adrian/Bob:  Thanks for your notes.  Much appreciated.  Hopefully, we
> will see some progress in the next couple of days.  The good news is
> that ICANN informed me last night that VeriSign has committed NOT to
> turn any registrars off while we work through this issue.  Thanks again.
> Jon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 2:08 AM
> To: Registrars Constituency
> Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: RRAs
> 
> At 09:56 AM 1/4/2007 Thursday  +1100, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
> >Although we have made comment to Verisign on the matter, the fact that
> >some of the "bigger" Registrars are prepared to speak out (when you
> have
> >the potentially the most to lose) is beneficial to the industry and to
> >the constituency members as a whole.
> 
> Dear Jon: We share in Adrian's expression of appreciation for your 
> efforts.  Regards, BobC
> 
> 
> 
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>