<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] Ragistrar Statement friendly amendment
- To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [registrars] Ragistrar Statement friendly amendment
- From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:47:13 +0200 (CEST)
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,
I suggest to alter 2b. While this may be appropriate for gTLDs,
it is not for sTLDs. sTLDs operate in a defined environment with
special needs, the GNSO has only limited insight. The delegation of
"certain" policy making decisions is appropriate - and necessary
unless you want the sTLD to stall - provided the policy
range is well-defined. The problem is to find a definition of the term
"certain".
Yours,
Marcus
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|