<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06
- To: "'Jordyn Buchanan'" <jbuchanan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Tim Ruiz'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06
- From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:53:37 +0530
- Cc: "'Jeffrey Eckhaus'" <jeckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <B231D476A3789B4ABEAED0CA1B129963037C7859@EXCHANGE.rcom.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcY+Yzw9ADYl8vYVRRiYtVdfBXxK2wAadP3wAUGXJXAAt6Q6cA==
i am happy to second jeff :)
- bhavin
_____
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jordyn Buchanan
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:19 AM
To: Bhavin Turakhia; Tim Ruiz; registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jeffrey Eckhaus
Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06
Bhavin:
I appreciate the nomination, but unfortunately I think between chairing the
Whois TF and my other obligations, I don't believe that I have time to
adequately serve the constituency in this capacity.
However, I would like to nominate one of my colleagues, Jeff Eckhaus, who
many of you may have met at recent ICANN meetings. Jeff has been tracking
many of the related policy issues and I believe he would be an excellent
representative on the task force.
Jordyn
_____
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bhavin Turakhia
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 9:22 AM
To: 'Tim Ruiz'; registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06
for the open spots i would like to nominate jon nevett and jordynn buchannan
for the council spots i would like to nominate ross rader
(above subject to interest of individual candidates)
bhavin
_____
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 7:03 AM
To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06
The GNSO Council has initiatied PDP-Feb06. The purpose of this task
force is to examine the policy implications of the registry contracts
and make policy recommendations in specific areas covered by the Task
Force Terms of Reference. Each constituency may appoint up to three
representatives to this task force, one of which should be a member of
the GNSO Council.
Therefore, I would like to open up nominations for the two open spots,
and the single council spot. Nominee's for either of the "open" seats
must only be members of the Registrar Constituency. Nominee's for the
"council" seat must be a member of the GNSO Council (i.e. one of Tom
Keller, Ross Rader or Bruce Tonkin).
This election will be conducted on one ballot. The GNSO Council member
with the highest level of support will be appointed to the Council seat.
The next two highest ranking nominee's will be appointed to the open
seats. There is no need to specify which seat a candidate is nominated for.
For example;
Case #1
Nominee #5 (Councillor) - 40% support
Nominee #3 - 30% support
Nominee #2 (Councillor) - 15% support
Nominee #4 - 10% support
Nominee #1 - 5% support
Nominee #5 would be appointed to the council seat, and nominee's #3 and
#2 would be appointed to the "open" seats.
Case #2
Nominee #3 - 40% support
Nominee #4 - 30% support
Nominee #1 - 15% support
Nominee #5 (Councillor) - 10% support
Nominee #2 (Councillor) - 5% support
Nominee #5 would be appointed to the council seat, and nominee's #3 and
#4 would be appointed to the "open" seats.
The genesis of PDP-Feb06:
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg02124.html
Tim
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|