RE: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06

["Jeffrey Eckhaus" <jeckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you Bruce and Jordyn - I accept the nomination 
 
 
I am the Director of Business & Corporate Development at Register.com an
ICANN accredited registrar.
 
I am not in possession of any registry proprietary or sensitive
information, nor have I ever been.
 
I am not an officer, director, consultant, or employee of any other
member of this constituency or any
other ICANN constituency.
 
 
Regards.
 
Jeff
 
 
 
________________________________

From: Bruce Tonkin [mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 7:11 PM
To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jeffrey Eckhaus
Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06
 
Hello Jordyn,
 
In view of your commitments and your nomination of Jeff Eckhaus, I am
happy to second the nomination of Jeff Eckhaus to this task force.
Jeff has attended many ICANN meetings, and I expect that you will be
able to brief Jeff on the various discussions that have been had so far
relating to this PDP.
 
It is better to spread the policy development around a few new faces :-)
 
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
 
	 
	
________________________________

	From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jordyn Buchanan
	Sent: Thursday, 9 March 2006 6:49 PM
	To: Bhavin Turakhia; Tim Ruiz; registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
	Cc: Jeffrey Eckhaus
	Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06
	Bhavin:
	 
	I appreciate the nomination, but unfortunately I think between
chairing the Whois TF and my other obligations, I don't believe that I
have time to adequately serve the constituency in this capacity.
	 
	However, I would like to nominate one of my colleagues, Jeff
Eckhaus, who many of you may have met at recent ICANN meetings.  Jeff
has been tracking many of the related policy issues and I believe he
would be an excellent representative on the task force.
	 
	Jordyn
	 
	
________________________________

	From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bhavin Turakhia
	Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 9:22 AM
	To: 'Tim Ruiz'; registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
	Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06
	for the open spots i would like to nominate jon nevett and
jordynn buchannan
	 
	for the council spots i would like to nominate ross rader
	 
	(above subject to interest of individual candidates)
	 
	bhavin
		 
		
________________________________

		From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
		Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 7:03 AM
		To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
		Subject: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06
		 
		The GNSO Council has initiatied PDP-Feb06. The purpose
of this task 
		force is to examine the policy implications of the
registry contracts 
		and make policy recommendations in specific areas
covered by the Task 
		Force Terms of Reference. Each constituency may appoint
up to three 
		representatives to this task force, one of which should
be a member of 
		the GNSO Council.
		
		Therefore, I would like to open up nominations for the
two open spots, 
		and the single council spot. Nominee's for either of the
"open" seats 
		must only be members of the Registrar Constituency.
Nominee's for the 
		"council" seat must be a member of the GNSO Council
(i.e. one of Tom 
		Keller, Ross Rader or Bruce Tonkin).
		
		This election will be conducted on one ballot. The GNSO
Council member 
		with the highest level of support will be appointed to
the Council seat. 
		The next two highest ranking nominee's will be appointed
to the open 
		seats. There is no need to specify which seat a
candidate is nominated for.
		
		For example;
		
		Case #1
		Nominee #5 (Councillor) - 40% support
		Nominee #3 - 30% support
		Nominee #2 (Councillor) - 15% support
		Nominee #4 - 10% support
		Nominee #1 - 5% support
		
		Nominee #5 would be appointed to the council seat, and
nominee's #3 and 
		#2 would be appointed to the "open" seats.
		
		Case #2
		Nominee #3 - 40% support
		Nominee #4 - 30% support
		Nominee #1 - 15% support
		Nominee #5 (Councillor) - 10% support
		Nominee #2 (Councillor) - 5% support
		
		Nominee #5 would be appointed to the council seat, and
nominee's #3 and 
		#4 would be appointed to the "open" seats. 
		The genesis of PDP-Feb06:
	
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg02124.html
		 
		Tim