RE: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06

["Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks.  I accept Bhavin's nomination and second the nomination of Ross.


Conflict of Interest Statement:

I am a Vice President of Network Solutions, LLC.  I also represent
NameSecure and SRSPlus, which are affiliated registrars.

I am not in possession of any registry proprietary or sensitive
information, nor have I ever been. I am not an officer, director,
consultant, or employee of any other member of this constituency or any
other ICANN constituency.

Thanks.

Jon


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ross Rader
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 11:03 AM
Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06

I accept Bhavin's nomination and would like to second the nomination of 
Jon and Jordyn.

My statement of interests is permanently available at 
http://www.byte.org/blog/_WebPages/StatementofInterestsforRossRader.html

It was most recently updated yesterday in anticipation of a Council vote

on the terms of reference for this PDP. If you have any questions, 
please let me know.

How long are nominations open for?

Bhavin Turakhia wrote:
> for the open spots i would like to nominate jon nevett and jordynn
buchannan
>  
> for the council spots i would like to nominate ross rader
>  
> (above subject to interest of individual candidates)
>  
> bhavin
> 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 7:03 AM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06
> 
> 
>  
> The GNSO Council has initiatied PDP-Feb06. The purpose of this task 
> force is to examine the policy implications of the registry contracts 
> and make policy recommendations in specific areas covered by the Task 
> Force Terms of Reference. Each constituency may appoint up to three 
> representatives to this task force, one of which should be a member of

> the GNSO Council.
> 
> Therefore, I would like to open up nominations for the two open spots,

> and the single council spot. Nominee's for either of the "open" seats 
> must only be members of the Registrar Constituency. Nominee's for the 
> "council" seat must be a member of the GNSO Council (i.e. one of Tom 
> Keller, Ross Rader or Bruce Tonkin).
> 
> This election will be conducted on one ballot. The GNSO Council member

> with the highest level of support will be appointed to the Council
seat. 
> The next two highest ranking nominee's will be appointed to the open 
> seats. There is no need to specify which seat a candidate is nominated
for.
> 
> For example;
> 
> Case #1
> Nominee #5 (Councillor) - 40% support
> Nominee #3 - 30% support
> Nominee #2 (Councillor) - 15% support
> Nominee #4 - 10% support
> Nominee #1 - 5% support
> 
> Nominee #5 would be appointed to the council seat, and nominee's #3
and 
> #2 would be appointed to the "open" seats.
> 
> Case #2
> Nominee #3 - 40% support
> Nominee #4 - 30% support
> Nominee #1 - 15% support
> Nominee #5 (Councillor) - 10% support
> Nominee #2 (Councillor) - 5% support
> 
> Nominee #5 would be appointed to the council seat, and nominee's #3
and 
> #4 would be appointed to the "open" seats. 
> 
> The genesis of PDP-Feb06:
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg02124.html
>  
> Tim 
> 
> 
>