Re: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06
I accept Bhavin's nomination and would like to second the nomination of Jon and Jordyn.
My statement of interests is permanently available at http://www.byte.org/blog/_WebPages/StatementofInterestsforRossRader.html
It was most recently updated yesterday in anticipation of a Council vote on the terms of reference for this PDP. If you have any questions, please let me know.
How long are nominations open for? Bhavin Turakhia wrote:
for the open spots i would like to nominate jon nevett and jordynn buchannanfor the council spots i would like to nominate ross rader (above subject to interest of individual candidates) bhavin_____From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 7:03 AM To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06The GNSO Council has initiatied PDP-Feb06. The purpose of this task force is to examine the policy implications of the registry contracts and make policy recommendations in specific areas covered by the Task Force Terms of Reference. Each constituency may appoint up to three representatives to this task force, one of which should be a member of the GNSO Council.Therefore, I would like to open up nominations for the two open spots, and the single council spot. Nominee's for either of the "open" seats must only be members of the Registrar Constituency. Nominee's for the "council" seat must be a member of the GNSO Council (i.e. one of Tom Keller, Ross Rader or Bruce Tonkin).This election will be conducted on one ballot. The GNSO Council member with the highest level of support will be appointed to the Council seat. The next two highest ranking nominee's will be appointed to the open seats. There is no need to specify which seat a candidate is nominated for.For example; Case #1 Nominee #5 (Councillor) - 40% support Nominee #3 - 30% support Nominee #2 (Councillor) - 15% support Nominee #4 - 10% support Nominee #1 - 5% supportNominee #5 would be appointed to the council seat, and nominee's #3 and #2 would be appointed to the "open" seats.Case #2 Nominee #3 - 40% support Nominee #4 - 30% support Nominee #1 - 15% support Nominee #5 (Councillor) - 10% support Nominee #2 (Councillor) - 5% supportNominee #5 would be appointed to the council seat, and nominee's #3 and #4 would be appointed to the "open" seats.The genesis of PDP-Feb06: http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg02124.htmlTim