<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Recently published
- To: "John Berryhill" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Recently published
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:21:44 -0500
- Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:54:01 EST." <S384527AbWBUOyC/20060221145403Z+14562@lmg07.affinity.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
john,
thanks. that brightened up my morning. anything using session state, or
not, which doesn't use smtp, to signal a change of state in a database,
via a link, specific to an instance of communication between registrar and
a customer.
time to work up a patent based on the non-link technology defined in
rfc 1149 (datagrams over avian carriers), and copy in a 3rd party, say
my cousin, on all registrar-to-customer non-email electronic message
communications.
the abstract appears to be broken as the last line in para 1 fails to
terminate (avoiding infringment claims by the holders of patents on
parts of speach, grammer, and punctuation).
tim, this is as funny as mdr staff deciding to hand the .com franchise
to vgrs in perpetuity.
eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|