RE: [registrars] Whois Operational Point of Contact Proposal Update

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ross, 


I would imagine we are going to get objections to this, especially with
the expiration date already out of it. What I don't want to see happen
is that we push elements in this proposal that keep it from being
acceptable overall to our own constituency, let alone the others. For
me, this is a tiny issue compared to the overall success of the OPoC
concept. I hope we can keep that in mind. As my Dad always said, pick
your battles wisely. 


Tim

 -------- Original Message --------
Subject: [registrars] Whois Operational Point of Contact Proposal
Update
From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, January 18, 2006 11:20 am
To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This version of the proposal contains two changes.

1) the requirement for registries and registrars to display the creation

date of a registration has been removed. Comments received at the ICANN 
Vancouver meeting indicated that the display of this data was 
inconsistent with the other data fields displayed.

2) a statement of scope was added.

If you have any questions or further comments, please let me know.

-ross