<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Expected turnout for teleconference on gTLD
- To: "'Robert F. Connelly'" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Expected turnout for teleconference on gTLD
- From: "Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:57:37 -0500
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <6.2.1.2.2.20060117133113.03a52eb0@pop3.loadmail.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcYbsf8eozQAk9a3QO++VkFXN0RX/AApn1Og
Bob,
If it is a huge concern, I am sure our techies can figure out how to
actually "pound" their servers to ensure we have the 20 lines used.
We seem to have some talent in this area.
<Grin>
Rob.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 4:33 PM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: [registrars] Expected turnout for teleconference on gTLD
Dear Ross:
I made the reservation for up to 20. If we fall far short,
FreeConference.com will "chastise me". Do you have any idea how many might
participate?
If necessary, I can also increase the number of lines up to several hours
prior to the starting time.
Regards, BobC, Secretary
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|