[registrars] Measures of success of the transfers policy

["Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Jordyn,

> 
> More importantly, as Tim points out, portability is no better 
> under the new transfer policy--the percentage of transfers 
> that succeeds seems to be no better now than under the 
> previous policy, with the exception of names managed by 
> registrants unlucky enough to misunderstand what locking does.
> 

One of the failings of the transfers policy work so far is that we have
never established a measureable benchmark for the current system.  Thus
it is hard to prove either way whether the policy met its objective.

I hope that before we do any more work, that we can at least establish a
measure whereby we can see whether policy changes make it better or
worse.

I think the perception of Melbourne IT is that it hasn't really got any
better, just more complex and expensive to administer.

Regards,
Bruce