<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency Position
- To: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency Position
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:29:31 +1000
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcXJC86rve07sLnkQ2mBu69MQ7cNVgBCQ/xQ
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency Position
Hello All,
For the purposes of ensuring that we can eventually converge on an
agreed version of a position paper on WHOIS, I second this motion from
Ross Rader so that the formal discussion period can commence as per our
bylaws.
I am of course open to suggestions from the constituency to improve the
motion or make changes to ensure its support.
I think it is important at this stage to get registrars agreement around
the core purpose of WHOIS in the context of ICANN's mission.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ross Rader
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 October 2005 3:37 AM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency Position
>
> Registrars;
>
> Per Whois Task Force 123's Terms of Reference, we are
> required to adopt a position concerning the purpose of the
> Whois service and the purpose of the Registered Name Holder,
> Technical and Administrative contacts (see below for an
> excerpt of the terms of reference for the task force).
>
> As a representative to this task force and with the input and
> assistance of the other representatives to this task force, I
> have prepared a policy position that I seek to have adopted
> by the constituency. This position statement is attached.
>
> I therefore would like to make a motion as follows;
>
> ***MOTION
> Whereas, the Registrar Constituency has considered a range of
> issues related to the intended and appropriate purpose of the
> gTLD Whois System, and;
>
> Whereas, the Registrar Constituency has considered a range of
> issues related to the intended and appropriate purpose of the
> Registered Name Holder, Administrative and Technical Contacts, and;
>
> Whereas, the Registrar Constituency seeks timely resolution
> of these matters in a consensus-based manner that takes into
> account the needs of all stakeholders including individual
> and corporate domain name registrants, the internetworking
> community and gTLD Registries and Registrars, therefore;
>
> Be it resolved that the Registrar formally adopts the
> position statement entitled "The Purpose of the gTLD Whois
> System and Specific Contact Records" and require its task
> force representatives to advocate these positions within the
> Task Force and other ICANN fora as appropriate.
> ***ENDofMOTION
>
> I have attached both Word and PDF versions of this document
> to this message. I will also be forwarding this draft
> document to the Task Force
> as a heads up concerning our deliberations.
>
> If you have any questions, please let me know. Your support
> for this motion would be sincerely appreciated.
>
> -ross
>
>
> Excerpt from WhoisTF123 Terms of Reference;
> (1) ...the purpose of the WHOIS service in the context of
> ICANN's mission and relevant core values, international and
> national laws protecting privacy of natural persons,
> international and national laws that relate specifically to
> the WHOIS service, and the changing nature of Registered Name Holders.
>
> (2) ...the purpose of the Registered Name Holder, technical,
> and administrative contacts, in the context of the purpose of
> WHOIS, and the purpose for which the data was collected. Use
> the relevant definitions from Exhibit C of the Transfers Task
> force report as a starting point (from
> http://www.icann.org/gnso/transfers-tf/report-exhc-12feb03.htm):
>
> "Contact: Contacts are individuals or entities associated
> with domain name records. Typically, third parties with
> specific inquiries or concerns will use contact records to
> determine who should act upon specific issues related to a
> domain name record. There are typically three of these
> contact types associated with a domain name record, the
> Administrative contact, the Billing contact and the Technical contact.
>
> Contact, Administrative: The administrative contact is an
> individual, role or organization authorized to interact with
> the Registry or Registrar on behalf of the Domain Holder. The
> administrative contact should be able to answer non-technical
> questions about the domain name's registration and the Domain
> Holder. In all cases, the Administrative Contact is viewed as
> the authoritative point of contact for the domain name,
> second only to the Domain Holder.
>
> Contact, Billing: The billing contact is the individual, role
> or organization designated to receive the invoice for domain
> name registration and re-registration fees.
>
> Contact, Technical: The technical contact is the individual,
> role or organization that is responsible for the technical
> operations of the delegated zone. This contact likely
> maintains the domain name server(s) for the domain. The
> technical contact should be able to answer technical
> questions about the domain name, the delegated zone and work
> with technically oriented people in other zones to solve
> technical problems that affect the domain name and/or zone.
>
> Domain Holder: The individual or organization that registers
> a specific domain name. This individual or organization holds
> the right to use that specific domain name for a specified
> period of time, provided certain conditions are met and the
> registration fees are paid. This person or organization is
> the "legal entity" bound by the terms of the relevant service
> agreement with the Registry operator for the TLD in question."
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|