ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency Position

  • To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency Position
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:13:36 -0700
  • In-reply-to: <0584E286D9C3C045B61DAB692193170B055ACAD4@yew2.wou3.local>
  • References: <0584E286D9C3C045B61DAB692193170B055ACAD4@yew2.wou3.local>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

At 09:49 AM 10/5/05, Paul Stahura wrote:
Because then we'd all have to transmit another command to the registry
if the registrant paid during the 45-day period.

Dear Paul: How about the requirement to have an "explicit" renewal? Regards, BobC


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 7:31 PM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency Position

At 07:12 PM 10/4/05, Paul Stahura wrote:
>2) Some registries cause another customer service problem and that is
>when a name is auto-renewed but the registrant hasn't paid.

Dear Paul:  Why not ask registries or ICANN to have the registry whois
say
"auto-renewed" (or something like that) until the 45 days passes unless
the
registrar executes an explicit renewal?  Regards, BobC





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>