RE: [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency Position

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

<div>Jay, according to our&nbsp;Rules of Procedure we need to first get
the motion endorsed (requires 5), then amendments can be offered. If
the amendment is accepted as friendly by the&nbsp;author of the
motion&nbsp;it is incorporated into the motion before the vote. If not,
the amendment is voted on separately along side the original motion.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>With that in mind, I endorse Ross' motion.<BR><BR></div>
<P style="MARGIN: 0px">Tim<BR></P><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT:
blue 2px solid"><BR>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: RE:
[registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency<BR>Position<BR>From:
"Jay Westerdal" &lt;jwesterdal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: Wed, October
05, 2005 1:32 pm<BR>To: "'Paul Stahura'" &lt;stahura@xxxxxxxx&gt;,
"'Robert F. Connelly'"<BR>&lt;BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;, "'Registrars
Constituency'"<BR>&lt;registrars@xxxxxxxx&gt;<BR><BR>Paul,<BR>I would
propose Registries follow a documented procedure for
showing<BR>expiration date since they are not authoritative instead of
just hiding the<BR>field flat out:<BR><BR>On expiration:<BR>A) if
Auto-renewed by Registry<BR>&nbsp; 1) Hide Expiration date with the
words "Pending Registrar Action".<BR>&nbsp; 2) After 45 days, set
expiration date to be a year from initial<BR>Expiration Date.<BR>B) if
Explicitly renewed by Registrar<BR>&nbsp; 1) Show new date <BR><BR>Ross
if you would like to except this as a friendly amendment I would
second<BR>your initial motion. I am not in favor of taking the
expiration date away<BR>from ISP, Hosting Companies, Advisers, Friends,
and Family of the domain<BR>owners at the Registry level but everything
else in your motion looks good.<BR><BR>Jay Westerdal<BR>Name
Intelligence, Inc.<BR>http://www.nameintelligence.com
&nbsp;<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From:
owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Paul Stahura<BR>Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 9:50
AM<BR>To: Robert F. Connelly; Registrars Constituency<BR>Subject: RE:
[registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency
Position<BR><BR>Because then we'd all have to transmit another command
to the registry<BR>if the registrant paid during the 45-day
period.<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From:
owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly<BR>Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 7:31
PM<BR>To: Registrars Constituency<BR>Subject: RE: [registrars] Ballot
Request: Adopt as Constituency Position<BR><BR>At 07:12 PM 10/4/05,
Paul Stahura wrote:<BR>&gt;2) Some registries cause another customer
service problem and that is<BR>&gt;when a name is auto-renewed but the
registrant hasn't paid.<BR><BR>Dear Paul: &nbsp;Why not ask registries
or ICANN to have the registry whois<BR>say <BR>"auto-renewed" (or
something like that) until the 45 days passes unless<BR>the
<BR>registrar executes an explicit renewal? &nbsp;Regards, BobC
</BLOCKQUOTE>