<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Vint Cerf joins Google
- To: michael@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Vint Cerf joins Google
- From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 17:40:39 -0400
- Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <001d01c5b4b9$dc5e3c80$6501a8c0@dnsconundrum>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <001d01c5b4b9$dc5e3c80$6501a8c0@dnsconundrum>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/2005 5:11 PM Michael D. Palage noted that;
> I know that some registrars have a position that no employee of a
> registry and/or registrar should serve on the ICANN Board. I personally
> do not share this overly restrictive view because it would currently
> prohibit such people as Bruce Tonkin, Tim Ruiz, Ross Rader, Paul
> Stahura, Tom Keller, Jon Nevett or other leaders within the registrar
> community from ever serving on the ICANN Board.
As both someone who holds this view and is also named on your list, its
worth noting that I think that its perfectly appropriate that everyone
on that list be restricted from serving on the board while they are in
the employ of organizations who have a major focus on the domain
registration market.
I don't think Vint suffers from this same conflict under Google's
current model.
- --
-rwr
Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
Skydasher: A great way to start your day
My weblog: http://www.byte.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
iD8DBQFDIK/X6sL06XjirooRAvPWAJ9pv8ubNcmW+8vaEUcEmEqSajbGHgCfdZau
xlyQW5MGEfQu7bsYqG6I8P4=
=Wkyk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|