<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] ICANN Invoice
- To: Robbie Birkner <rbirkner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] ICANN Invoice
- From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:56:04 +0200 (CEST)
- Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <431EECDD.3040204@key-systems.net> from Robbie Birkner at "Sep 7, 2005 03:36:29 pm"
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
I have always been into transparency. I would support this idea as the
interest to guarantee equal treatment requires this openness.
Yours,
Marcus
> Dear Members,
>
> just recently we received our ICANN fourth quarter of the fiscal year
> invoice.
>
> In the cover letter was stated:
>
> "For your information, a registrar that was active the entire year, paid a per registrar variable fee of $ 8,809. Those registrars that applied for and were found eligible for relief paid one-third of the variable fee amount. The number of registrars that have received forgiveness of a portion of the fees has varied from quarter to quarter. The maximum number in any one quarter is 29".
>
>
> Question for the consitutency:
> As mostly all registrars are financing a great deal of ICANN and we are
> basically all sitting in the same boat, we would like to see the
> procedure of "forgiveness" to be a transparent one, providing the paying
> registrars with information on the registrars that were granted
> forgiveness on a quarterly basis.
>
> Any opinions? Would this be something, that could be of interest to the
> constituency?
>
> Robbie
> Key-Systems GmbH
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|