[registrars] Registrar Constituency Statement on Whois Conflicts w/ National Law
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A redlined copy of the edits to the proposal recommended by the Registrar Constituency position is included as a WORD and PDF attachment to this document. These recommendations have been reviewed by the constituency and ratified by a super-majority vote conducted in accordance with the Registrar Constituency Bylaws. A summary of the recommended changes is as follows: 1. Section II should be positioned as guidance for the staff in establishing recommended procedures for handling whois conflicts with national law. Section II therefore would be a non-exhaustive, non-binding suggestion rather than a consensus policy recommendation that must be implemented as written. 2. Section II, Step 2 should include additional language that ensures that the registrar in question has worked with staff to identify whether or not a solution exists that satisfies the requirements of local law and the ICANN policy in question. 3. There are other minor stylistic edits redlined throughout the document. If there are any questions, please let me or one of the other registrar representatives know. On 22/08/2005 9:27 PM Ross Wm. Rader noted that; > We finally have an official position. I will ensure that it gets > forwarded to the list sometime after I eat but before I sleep :) > > > On 8/22/2005 8:38 PM Maria Farrell noted that: > >> A follow-up note - I should also have mentioned that the Registrars >> Constituency hasn't yet sent its constituency statement on >> recommendation 2. >> >> >> Thanks, Maria >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On >> Behalf Of Maria Farrell >> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 4:32 PM >> To: 'Jordyn A. Buchanan'; 'Whois TF mailing list' >> Subject: [gnso-dow123] Final call for constituency statements - Rec. 2 on >> conflicts with national law >> >> Dear all, >> >> There are still some constituency statements outstanding on >> Recommendation 2 >> on conflicts with national laws. It is my understanding of the ICANN >> bylaws >> that we will need these statements in order to compile the preliminary >> task >> force report ahead of next week's vote on the recommendation. >> We have received constituency statements from the following >> constituencies: >> >> Registry constituency, ISPCP constituency, NCUC. >> >> I do not have a record of receiving statements from the following >> constituencies: >> >> Business constituency, IP constituency. >> So, if you haven't already done so, please submit your constituency >> statement to the task force mailing list as soon as possible. >> >> Bearing in mind that the preliminary task force report should get to the >> task force several working days before the vote to allow people to >> read it, >> I will really need the last statements by this Wednesday (24 August) >> at the >> very latest. >> >> Many thanks, Maria >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On >> Behalf Of Jordyn A. Buchanan >> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 7:56 AM >> To: Whois TF mailing list >> Subject: [gnso-dow123] Next Conference Call >> >> Hi all: >> >> Due to a late-arising conflict, I'm unable to chair the call tomorrow. >> Given that we still need to distribute the preliminary report and have >> little on-list discussion regarding the purpose of Whois, I think it's >> best >> to postpone the call a week. >> >> Therefore, there will be no task force call tomorrow. Instead, the next >> call will be on August 30. The current agenda items for that call are: >> >> - Vote to approve the preliminary report on the recommendations regarding >> conflict with national laws >> - Further discussion on purpose of Whois >> >> Jordyn >> > > - -- - -- Regards, -rwr "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument, every utensil, every article designed for use, of each and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings." - Robert Collier Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com My Blogware: http://www.byte.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP) iD4DBQFDCz716sL06XjirooRAoH6AJdJk1zJteEoA6PlOjx72RPhqrGOAJ0efER+ 3huysvGEmFhARFeCC2XOCA== =lh9o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Attachment:
whois-law-conflicts-rrar-consensus-edit.pdf Attachment:
whois-law-conflicts-rrar-consensus-edit.doc |