ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] .NET Agreement Update

  • To: "'Robert F Connelly'" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] .NET Agreement Update
  • From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:29:37 +0530
  • In-reply-to: <6.2.1.2.2.20050822224457.03e8deb0@pop3.loadmail.com>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcWnp4c5WokUQBdHSU2rfZP0ehYaZwAGLjgg

> >Take out the abstract of changes we have made in the .NET 
> RRA, and form 
> >a single statement from that abstract.
> >
> >We will then make that statement as the Constituency's 
> official position.
> 
> Dear Ross:  If this proposal and the fleshed out document 
> meets with your approval, we may take it as a friendly 
> amendment to your motion.  What think you?  Regards, BobC

I believe me and Ross were trying the same thing essentially

bhavin




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>