<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] .NET Agreement Update
- To: "'Robert F Connelly'" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] .NET Agreement Update
- From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:29:37 +0530
- In-reply-to: <6.2.1.2.2.20050822224457.03e8deb0@pop3.loadmail.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcWnp4c5WokUQBdHSU2rfZP0ehYaZwAGLjgg
> >Take out the abstract of changes we have made in the .NET
> RRA, and form
> >a single statement from that abstract.
> >
> >We will then make that statement as the Constituency's
> official position.
>
> Dear Ross: If this proposal and the fleshed out document
> meets with your approval, we may take it as a friendly
> amendment to your motion. What think you? Regards, BobC
I believe me and Ross were trying the same thing essentially
bhavin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|