RE: [registrars] Registrars constituency website rehaul

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bhavin,

There should be nothing proprietary *in* the resultant site. We should be
able to move the development and maintenance of it to whomever we like. And
we should have full control of the IP, copyright, whatever.

Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bhavin Turakhia
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 1:20 PM
To: 'Jay Westerdal'; registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [registrars] Registrars constituency website rehaul


Hi all,

I will consult and figure out if this will be possible. we are engaging an
agency to do this. They would not volunteer to opensource their propreitary
libraries since this is what they do for a living :)

bhavin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jay Westerdal
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 12:14 AM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Registrars constituency website rehaul
> 
> I second making it open for all under one of those licenses.
> 
> Jay Westerdal
> Name Intelligence, Inc.
> http://www.nameintelligence.com  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ross Rader
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 8:24 AM
> To: Bhavin Turakhia
> Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Registrars constituency website rehaul
> 
> Great observation Mike.
> 
> > We could
> > also turn over the intellectual property rights to ICANN or 
> GNSO etc. 
> 
> I'd like to propose that we choose a suitable open license 
> like the Gnu Public License (www.gnu.org) or one of the 
> Creative Commons licenses
> (www.creativecommons.org)
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                        -rwr
> 
> 
> 
> Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
> Skydasher: A great way to start your day My weblog: 
> http://www.byte.org
> 
> 
>