[registrars] RE: [registrars] [Fwd: [council] Registry Constituency IDN communiqué]

["Michael D. Palage" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ross;

I fully concur with the importance of this document. I think registrars have
a very strong interest in ensuring that any response to Homograph Spoofing
is measured and appropriate. I think this is an issue, that particularly
Asian/Pacific or European registrars should make their voice heard, although
a large number of North American registrars have significant IDN based
registrations.

Best regards,

Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Ross Rader
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 1:41 PM
To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [registrars] [Fwd: [council] Registry Constituency IDN
communiqué]


This is an important document. I had a long chat with Cary about this
communique last week and indicated to him that I would support this
activity within the registrar constituency. Please review at your
earlier convenience and definitely pass on any comments you might have.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] Registry Constituency IDN communiqué
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:59:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Cary Karp <ck@nic.museum>
Reply-To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The communiqué that I mentioned at last week's Council meeting is
now on-line at:

  	http://www.icann.org/topics/news022305.html

You may also wish to note the broader topic page that ICANN has
posted at:

  	http://www.icann.org/topics/idn.html

/Cary

--





                       -rwr



Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
Skydasher: A great way to start your day
My weblog: http://www.byte.org