<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
- To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
- From: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:58:06 -0800
- In-reply-to: <9A9B4ED8FC9E334AA0B654078CFDAA6FA18284@VAMAIL3.CORPIT.NSI. NET>
- References: <9A9B4ED8FC9E334AA0B654078CFDAA6FA18284@VAMAIL3.CORPIT.NSI.NET>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
At 12:51 PM 1/26/05, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
I believe that the reference is correct.
RAA=Registrar Accreditation Agreement
RRA=Registry-Registrar Agreement
Dear Jon: It's very early here in Tokyo, I though you were referring to the
Registrar-Registrant Agreement. Regards, BobC
Section 3.7.7 et seq. of the RAA is at issue.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|