<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
- To: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
- From: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:51:52 -0500
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcUD57/gJCKb3W4cQwuNYU/h3tV6IQAALgyQ
- Thread-topic: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
Bob:
I believe that the reference is correct.
RAA=Registrar Accreditation Agreement
RRA=Registry-Registrar Agreement
Section 3.7.7 et seq. of the RAA is at issue.
Thanks.
Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 3:29 PM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois
tf 1/2 recommendations
At 07:51 AM 1/26/05, Ross Rader wrote:
>As one of the supporters of Tim's original motion, I would also like to
>lend my endorsement to this amendment.
Let me the third to endorse this draft.
Question: Should it refer to RAA or RRA?
Regards, BobC
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|