ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations

  • To: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
  • From: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:51:52 -0500
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcUD57/gJCKb3W4cQwuNYU/h3tV6IQAALgyQ
  • Thread-topic: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations

Bob:

I believe that the reference is correct.

RAA=Registrar Accreditation Agreement
RRA=Registry-Registrar Agreement

Section 3.7.7 et seq. of the RAA is at issue. 

Thanks.

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 3:29 PM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois
tf 1/2 recommendations

At 07:51 AM 1/26/05, Ross Rader wrote:
>As one of the supporters of Tim's original motion, I would also like to
>lend my endorsement to this amendment.

Let me the third to endorse this draft.

Question:  Should it refer to RAA or RRA?

Regards, BobC









<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>