Re: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 21/01/2005 2:20 AM Robert F. Connelly noted that;

| I find that hard to buy;-( BobC

The references to RRs was specifically phrased such that it governed
meeting proceedings. The drafting group all agreed that it was
appropriate to use a much more lightweight mechanism than RRs to manage
balloting. This was where the notion of the rules of procedure were born
and why the clauses that specify RRs as the governing procedure only
does so in reference to physical meetings and teleconferences. I don't
have the precise clause handy, but I was the primary editor of the
bylaws during the last two rounds of amendment and have more than a
passing familiarity with the letter and intent of the document. On the
other hand, don't ask me to answer anything serious about the ROP, that
was ink from someone else's pen.

- --




~                       -rwr



Skydasher: A great way to start your day

My contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
My weblog: http://www.byte.org/




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)

iD8DBQFB8Vqh6sL06XjirooRAm/YAJ44zHIMyzBLkPtX6QI6ZKwUqUZtkACfdJt9
eU3iFL8Ekwo1TMPCuzEaJMQ=
=7k1R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----