Re: [registrars] Re: panix.com hijacked

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 1/16/2005 12:29 AM Mark Jeftovic noted that:

> There's a thread on NANOG to the effect that panix.com has been
> hijacked from Dotster over to MelbourneIT and it has pretty
> well taken panix.com and its customers offline, see
> http://www.panix.net/
I don't see what you are looking at - .net and .com point to the same 
place with no indication of anything awry...of course, I'm late to the 
game and the DNS probably tells a different story...
> Looks like this may be among the first high-profile unauthorized
> transfer under the new transfer policy.
Looks like a bunch of guys on the NANOG list engaging in a lot of 
conjecture without the benefit of a lot of facts.
> Maybe there needs to some sort of emergency reversion where at least the
> nameservers can be rolled back immediately while the contesting parties
> sort it out.
Might be interesting - what criteria would trigger the process?



--
Regards,


	-rwr






"In the modern world the intelligence of public opinion is the one 
indispensable condition for social progress."
	- Charles W. Eliot (1834 - 1926)