ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Transfers: The whois issue

  • To: "'Marcus Faure'" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Transfers: The whois issue
  • From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:16:12 +0530
  • In-reply-to: <200410221517.i9MFHrsC011414@brian.voerde.globvill.de>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcS4S6j27grnxISmQkKKKJn+AD2RJwAAjt5A


> I am not sure if we had an agreement in the past that 
> mandates registrars to open their whois for other registrars? 
> The issue just came up during our tests with the new transfer 
> policy for thin registries (actually the thin registry). Many 
> registrars have a threshhold on their whois to prevent 
> datamining. This may be a little low for the upcoming 
> transfer policy whois storm. Is there any recommended 
> procedure, e.g. a list of registar contacts that would take 
> care of raising the threshhold for our systems?

I want to make this a part of the constituency website and application - but
it will not be ready by the time the new trfer policy is adopted

bhavin




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>