<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Proposed short term solution to registry contention
- To: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Proposed short term solution to registry contention
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:53:32 +1000
- Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcSwxr36ctr3r2GKSfmEiRKgJjqbrAAAD2Ow
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Proposed short term solution to registry contention
Hello Eric,
>
> > (1) Registry implement auction mode for deleted names where
> there is
> > more than one registrar wishing to register the same name
>
> My preference today <registrar hat==on> is for registrars to
> "own" the "deleted front-end". My preference tomorrow
> <registry hat==on> may not be the same. I suspect I'll always
> want vgrs not to implement the auction mode.
Does that mean you would prefer a different entity run the auction
system rather than the registry?
I guess this could be done using a competitive tender process operated
by ICANN to operate the ".com registry auction system" for names about
to be re-released. Problem is it would take time.
Regards,
Bruce
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|