ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Nominations for Chair.

  • To: "'Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine'" <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Nominations for Chair.
  • From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:07:24 -0500
  • Cc: "'Robert F. Connelly'" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <200409090855.i898t3DR003002@nic-naa.net>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Eric,

I'm not trying to cut anything short, just keeping it moving along. The
sooner we have a new Chair, the sooner I'm no longer filling that role in
the interim :)

I am also happy to second the nomination of Eric Brunner-Williams for Chair.

Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Brunner-Williams
in Portland Maine
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 3:55 AM
To: Tim Ruiz
Cc: Robert F. Connelly; Registrars Constituency; brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] Nominations for Chair. 

Tim,

Between Bob's note of the 25th and today I didn't actually notice a date
when nominations would close. I could have overlooked it, and some mail
to the list appears to be duplicated and time-delayed (your note of the
4th, apparently resent on the 7th).

In any event, since no one seconded the nomination by Werner Staub and
Marcus Faure, I suppose I don't need to accept the nomination now that
the vote has been called. For what it is worth, had the nomination a
second, I would have accepted and worked up the conflicts statement and
so on.

My point is only this, process counts.

Eric




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>