<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Nominations for Chair.
- To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Nominations for Chair.
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 08:55:03 +0000
- Cc: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>, brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 09 Sep 2004 04:02:55 MST." <20040909110255.8976.qmail@webmail01.mesa1.secureserver.net>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tim,
Between Bob's note of the 25th and today I didn't actually notice a date
when nominations would close. I could have overlooked it, and some mail
to the list appears to be duplicated and time-delayed (your note of the
4th, apparently resent on the 7th).
In any event, since no one seconded the nomination by Werner Staub and
Marcus Faure, I suppose I don't need to accept the nomination now that
the vote has been called. For what it is worth, had the nomination a
second, I would have accepted and worked up the conflicts statement and
so on.
My point is only this, process counts.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|