Re: [registrars] New transfer policy concerns

[Jean-Michel Becar <jmbecar@xxxxxx>]

Hi Marcus,

Yep I fully agree with you and I share the same worries.
But this show us a bigger problem than it seems...for me we just lack of 
communication back and forth between registries and registrars.
Why not to put in place an official liaison person between registries 
and registrars and that person would report on a regular basis to the 
constituencies.
now we have some projects ongoing with the registries but we don't have 
that much follow up:
- EPP 1.0 migration
- new Transfer policy
.....
just my 2 cents contribution.
Jean-Michel


Marcus Faure wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am beginning to ask myself if the enforcement of the new transfer policy
> will take effect on November 12. I will share my experience with verisign and
> pir as we are responsible for the communication with these registries inside
> CORE.
>
> - Both registries have not published any documentation or software regarding
>  registry changes, e.g. transfer undos
>
> - verisign has not confirmed that they will use authinfo codes after epp 
>  transition
> - verisign told us there is no "dead end" date for rrp, meaning some registrars
>  will be on epp and some may stay on rrp (forever?). There is no information
>  how transfers will work between rrp and epp registrars
>
> - verisign will stay thin, whois standardization is not around. This means that
>  all existing registrars will have to implement a new whois parser for each
>  new registrar that show up. This can't be it.
>
> And these are only the major issues.
> I wonder how we should solve this before November.
>
> Yours,
> Marcus
>
>