<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] PIR EPP 1.0 and Domain Info command
- To: "Jay Westerdal" <jwesterdal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] PIR EPP 1.0 and Domain Info command
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 21:22:29 +0000
- Cc: "'Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine'" <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Bruce Tonkin'" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxx, bbeckwith@xxxxxxx, brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Aug 2004 13:52:17 MST." <200408092052.i79KqET06101@holiday.com.at.spry.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jay,
I might be in favor of your proposal if it were coming from within a
safe-and-sane process for the modification of the <info> response of
some EPP-using registry.
However, the PIR change is a unilateral dork, and correcting it by a
second dork is admitting that ICANN process w.r.t. the technical
oversight of registries consists of a series of dorks in a process
of dorkage.
I'd simply prefer another ICANN BoD rap-on-knuckles, as ocurred with
the VGRS wildcard scheme.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|