ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Resellers a burden upon ICANN

  • To: "'Robert F. Connelly'" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Resellers a burden upon ICANN
  • From: "tbarrett" <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:37:05 -0400
  • Cc: "'Kurt Pritz'" <pritz@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <6.1.0.6.2.20040609075452.02a47100@mail.beach.net>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I think Bob makes an excellent point.

Independent of how the ICANN budget assesses fees from registrars, ICANN
should publish a regular report detailing which specific registrars were the
subject of complaints, compliance enforcement or other matters.

We should all know which registrars are the repeated causes of on-going
ICANN expenses.

Tom Barrett
EnCirca, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 10:59 AM
To: Registrars Constituency
Cc: Kurt Pritz
Subject: Re: [registrars] Resellers a burden upon ICANN


At 01:14 AM 6/9/04, Thomas Keller wrote:
>I guess the point Paul was trying to make was that the complains to 
>ICANN are not related to the amount of registrations a registrar has.

Dear Thomas:  I totally reject your thesis. I'm traveling and less able to 
write my reasons.

OTOH, I am raising a demand that ICANN quantify their allegation.  If ICANN 
is doing work for which we must pay and it is related to registrar 
malfeasance, we should be provided with a list of the culprits and the 
number of cases thereto related;-)

This is supposed to be an open society.

Cordially, BobC









<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>