<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Whois draft
- To: "'Thomas Keller'" <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Whois draft
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:24:58 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <20040302135301.GA5068@schlund.de>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tom,
Not sure I completely understand what you're after with the delayed
disclosure for the privileged tier, so correct me if I am making an
incorrect assumption here.
What are the grounds on which you base not disclosing an access event to the
data subject simply upon request of the privileged tier data user?
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Keller
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 7:53 AM
To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [registrars] Whois draft
Hello,
please find attached the paper I referred to this morning. It is
already supported by
Core
Deutsche Telekom
Key-System
Namebay
PSI USA
Schlund + Partner
tom
--
Thomas Keller
Domain Services
Schlund + Partner AG
Brauerstrasse 48 Tel. +49-721-91374-534
76135 Karlsruhe, Germany Fax +49-721-91374-215
http://www.schlund.de tom@xxxxxxxxxx
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|