<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Straw Poll
- To: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Straw Poll
- From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:22:35 -0500
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcQFvMWHVECmeaEARGe16EdHRhZUEwAHKADw
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Straw Poll
Eric - the question I posted was actually raised by another registrar and I shared it with the constituency to get input. Having heard from several people online that they still want to proceed with the vote, my remaining question is whether the proponents of this motion want to edit the language to make it more relevant to the fact that board vote had taken place or keep this language.
Elana Broitman
Register.com
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
> EFax (800) 886-2716
Fax (212) 629-9309
ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
[mailto:brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 5:02 AM
To: Elana Broitman
Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] Straw Poll
> One more note on this motion - now that the Board has voted on WLS, do the
> proponents still want a vote on this?
Of course. If we only voted with the Board what point would there be in the
notion of a registrar constituency? Please see By-Laws, kindly post section
empowering Chair to declare ballot question moot, etc. Thx.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|